LWVCEF LWVC HOME - ELECTION '00 - VOTING Q&As - STATE PROPS - ABOUT LWV
ON BALLOT MEASURES: ABOUT OUR ANALYSIS - LIST of PROPS - SMART VOTER
LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS OF CALIFORNIA EDUCATION FUND
Nonpartisan In Depth Analysis of

PROPOSITION 16

VETERANS' HOMES BOND ACT OF 2000

See An Overview of State Bond Debt Legislative Bond Act

THE QUESTION

Should the state borrow $50 million through the sale of general obligation bonds to construct and renovate state-owned veterans' homes?

PROVISIONS

Proposition 16 would authorize California to borrow $50 million through the sale of general obligation bonds for construction of new veterans' homes and renovation of existing veterans' homes:

  • Would replace the current authorization for $24 million of lease-payment bonds to construct the next two veterans' homes, reducing the interest rate
  • Would construct additional veterans' homes and renovate the veterans' home in Yountville (Napa County), with the remaining $26 million
  • Would try to award at least 3% of the construction contracts to disabled veterans.

BACKGROUND

The states own and operate state veterans' homes. The federal government also provides funding. State veterans' homes care for elderly and disabled veterans living in the state. In 43 states, a total of 95 veterans' homes provide 5,891 independent living beds, and 90 nursing homes provide 17,794 nursing-care beds.

The U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs established the state veterans' home program in 1888 to provide federal aid to state veterans' homes. These homes care for elderly and disabled veterans who cannot earn a living. Federal aid to the states consists of funding up to 65% of construction costs as well as per diem payments for nursing home and hospital care.

Over three million veterans currently live in California. The need for care is expected to increase. The Department of Veterans Affairs says the need exists now for 7,000 nursing care and 5,600 independent living beds.

In 1884, the state established a veterans' home in Yountville (Napa County) which has beds for 1421 veterans. This veterans' home is undergoing significant renovations. When renovations are complete, Yountville will care for 1600 veterans. About $20 million is required for the next five-year plan for projects at Yountville. The Yountville veterans' home has independent living and five levels of nursing care for veterans 62 years and older or disabled.

In 1996, a second veterans' home opened in Barstow (San Bernardino County), which can care for 400 veterans. Barstow Community College donated the 22 acres for this site. This veterans' home has 220 beds for independent living and 180 beds for two levels of nursing care.

A third veterans' home is under construction in Chula Vista (San Diego County) and will care for 400 veterans. In 1997, Chula Vista donated 25 acres for this veterans' home, next to Sharp-Chula Vista Community Hospital. Construction began in spring 1998 and the home will be ready for occupancy in April 2000. This veterans' home will have 165 beds for independent living, 55 beds for assisted living and 180 beds for nursing care.

The state has authorized two additional veterans' homes, planned in Lancaster (Los Angeles County) and Saticoy (Ventura County). In 1997, Lancaster proposed a site of 23 acres for the veterans' home. Construction is expected to start in spring 2001 and conclude in spring 2003.

Two additional veterans' homes may also be needed within the next ten years. An additional veterans' home, preferably located near a university hospital, was recommended for veterans with Alzheimer's disease or dementia.

Current policy excludes veterans with Alzheimer's disease or other types of dementia. It is the legislature's intent to include them and to plan a new veterans' home for them.

Only after the veterans' home in Chula Vista is completed, opened, fully operational, and need is demonstrated for an additional site, would the next site be constructed.

The bonds would provide funds first for those veterans' homes that have already been planned. Any remaining funds would be used for renovation at Yountville and for additional new homes.

Twenty-four million dollars of this $50 million bond act would replace current lease-payment bonds for planned renovation and construction of state veterans' homes, which would reduce the interest rate. Thirty-six million dollars of lease-payment bonds have been authorized and are currently being used for construction at Chula Vista, with over $24 million not used but planned for the two additional veterans' homes.

Funding for the repairs at Yountville over the past 15 years has come from the state's General Fund through budget acts. Funding for the construction at Chula Vista, and for planned construction at Lancaster and Saticoy, has come from lease-payment bonds.

A goal of 3% of the construction contracts would be awarded to disabled veterans.

Related legislation in AB 193 (Cardoza), signed by the Governor in October, creates a twelve-member commission to advise the Governor and Legislature about planning and construction of these additional veterans' homes.

FISCAL EFFECT

According to the Legislative Analyst, the total estimated state cost would be $33 million over 25 years. Payments would be about $1 million per year. $24 million of the $50 million general obligation bonds would replace currently authorized lease-payment bonds, which are more expensive to finance than general obligation bonds.

Cost to operate local facilities:

The state will incur additional cost for daily care for veterans residing in the newly constructed veterans' homes. In state veterans' homes, current daily rates per person are $19.52 for independent living, and $43.92 for nursing home care. The federal government provides funds for about 28-33% of this cost.

IMPACT OF YES OR NO VOTE

A YES vote means the state could issue $50 million in general obligation bonds to construct and renovate state-owned veterans' homes, with $24 million replacing current lease-payment bonds.

A NO vote means the state would not be able to issue new general obligation bonds to construct and renovate state-owned veterans' homes, and the current authorization of lease-payment bonds would not be changed.

SUPPORTERS SAY

  • These bonds will not increase taxes.
  • These funds are urgently needed to provide care for United States veterans who live in California. The number of veterans qualified to enter veterans' homes in the next ten years will increase.
  • Two new veterans' homes, one in Los Angeles County and one in Ventura County, have been authorized. These bonds pay the state's share of construction, with the federal government funding up to 65%.
  • Current policy needs extension to include veterans with Alzheimer's disease and other types of dementia, and a veterans' home constructed to care for them.

OPPONENTS SAY

  • General obligation bonds can double the cost to the taxpayer.
  • Funding directly from the state General Fund is recommended, since the amount is small compared to the state budget of $81 billion.
  • The state budget has grown from $63 billion to $81 billion in four years, and $4 billion this year was surplus. Some of those funds could have been used for veterans' homes, saving both interest and election costs.
  • Instead of building new veterans' homes, the government could place and pay for veterans in private facilities that already exist.

SUPPORT AND OPPOSITION

The official ballot arguments in support are signed by Gray Davis, Governor of California; John McCain, U.S. Senator, Arizona; Joe Dunn, State Senator; Willy Wilkin, California State Commander of the American Legion; Richard Eubank, California State Commander of Veterans of Foreign Wars; and Georges Robin, California Legislative Officer, Military Order of the Purple Heart.

Other supporters mentioned in the ballot argument include the American Association of Retired Persons.

The official ballot arguments in opposition are signed by Gail K. Lightfoot, Past Chair, Libertarian Party of California; Larry Hines, U.S. Marine Corps veteran; and Ted Brown, Insurance Adjuster/Investigator.

For more information:

Supporters: Senator Joe Dunn, Friends of California Veterans, 916-441-4759, email prop16@vetbond.com, www.vetbond.com

Opponents: Ted Brown, Libertarian Party of California, 626-614-0630, email tebrown@earthlink.net, www.ca.lp.org


On Propositions: About our Analysis - List of Props - Smart Voter
LWVC Home - Election '00 - Voting Q&As - State Props - About Us


Last updated: January 24, 2000
Send comments and suggestions concerning the content of this page to lwvcprocon@hotmail.com.
Send comments concerning the format or usability of this page to cmwatts@ibm.net


Copyright 2000 League of Women Voters of California Education Fund. All rights reserved.
This page may be linked to or printed in its entirety as long as "About our Analysis" page is also printed.