LWVCEF
> LWVC HOME - VOTING Q&As - STATE PROPS - ABOUT LWV
> ON BALLOT MEASURES: ABOUT OUR ANALYSIS - LIST of PROPS - SMART VOTER
LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS OF CALIFORNIA EDUCATION FUND
Nonpartisan In Depth Analysis of

PROPOSITION 32

VETERAN'S BOND ACT OF 2000

Legislative Bond Act

THE QUESTION

Should the state borrow $500 million ($500,000,000) through the sale of general obligation bonds to replenish California Veterans (Cal-Vet) funding for long-term farm and home loans made to California veterans?

PROVISIONS

This measure would replace general obligation funds which have been repaid to the public. This money is to be used solely to help veterans purchase property.

BACKGROUND

At the end of World War I, the California Legislature approved the California Farm, Home and Mobile Home Purchase Assistance Program, which assists veterans in the purchase of property. Voters have approved all 25 bond measures since 1922 to fund this program. More than 400,000 veterans have been helped.

The money is used to purchase farms, homes, and mobile homes by veterans who repay the state in monthly payments, including interest. Any veteran living in California is eligible.

General obligation bonds are offered to the public and, over the life of the bond, the money is paid back to the bond investors. Mortgage payments by veterans offset the bond debt.

The last replenishment of funds was in November 1996, and it is projected that the last of the bonds will be sold by the summer of 2002, depleting the fund.

FISCAL EFFECT

According to the Legislative Analyst, the Cal-Vet program has always been self-supporting, the costs having been repaid by the veterans. If, however, the payments of the veterans were not sufficient to cover the amount of the bonds, the taxpayers would be required to make up the difference. The bonds will not be sold until the existing funds in the program are used up, probably in 2002.

The bonds, paid off over 25 years and at an interest of 5.5 percent, would amount to about $858 million ($500 million in principal and $358 million in interest).

IMPACT OF YES OR NO VOTE

A YES vote means that the state could sell $500 million in bonds to refinance the Cal-Vet program.

A NO vote means that the state could not sell these bonds.

SUPPORTERS SAY

  • This program helps veterans purchase homes and farms in California at no expense to the taxpayers.
  • Cal-Vet has enabled about 400,000 veterans to purchase homes and farms.
  • Both the Senate and the Assembly approved this measure unanimously.

OPPONENTS SAY

  • Money raised in selling tax-free bonds could be spent on taxable investments, bringing money into the state and federal treasuries.
  • The program is not limited to persons who served in actual combat. This should be available only to those disabled in military combat.

SUPPORT AND OPPOSITION

The official ballot arguments in support are signed by Assemblyman John A. Dutra, Chair, Assembly Committee on Veterans Affairs and Senator K. Maurice Johannessen, Chair, Senate Committee on Veterans Affairs.

The official ballot arguments in opposition are signed by Melvin Emerich and Gary B. Wesley, Cochairmen, Voter Information Alliance.

For more information:

Supporters: Assemblyman Glenn Gilbert, Assembly Committee on Veterans Affairs; (916) 319-2486; email: glenn.gilbert@asm.ca.gov

Opponents: Melvin L. Emerich, Attorney at Law; (408) 995-3224; website: www.melemerich.com


> On Propositions: About our Analysis - List of Props - Smart Voter
> LWVC Home - Voting Q&As - State Props - About Us


Last updated: September 18, 2000
Send comments and suggestions concerning the content of this page to lwvcprocon@hotmail.com.
Send comments concerning the format or usability of this page to lwvc@vcwatts.org


Copyright 2000 League of Women Voters of California Education Fund. All rights reserved.
This page may be linked to or printed in its entirety as long as "About our Analysis" page is also printed.