THE QUESTION Should local governments be authorized to contract to share sales tax or use tax revenues without a vote of the people? THE SITUATION The state Constitution allows cities and counties to impose a 1.25 percent tax on retail sales. However, there are often imbalances between communities that collect the sales tax revenue and neighboring communities that shoulder the burdens of infrastructure, traffic, and public services. Communities compete to attract large retailers by offering sales tax refunds, diverting tax revenues that would be used for public services. The Constitution allows cities and counties to contract to share sales tax revenue, but these contracts must be approved by a majority of the voters in each jurisdiction. No California community has proposed such a contract. PROVISIONS This measure adds an alternate process for sharing sales tax revenues that requires a 2/3 vote of each city council and/or county board of supervisors instead of approval by a majority of the voters in each jurisdiction. In effect, it shifts the power to share tax revenues from the voters to their elected representatives. FISCAL EFFECT The State Board of Equalization may incur additional costs to administer an increased number of jurisdictions that have elected to enter into the contracts authorized by this proposition. SUPPORTERS SAY
(Nonpartisan analysis prepared by the League of Women Voters of California Education Fund.)
|