League of Women Voters of California Education Fund

Community forums on “Choices for a VitalCommunity: Which Way to Go?”

A tool for public dialogue on quality of life

 

Part of the LWVCEF Civic Education Project:Building the Future 1999-2002

funded by the William and Flora Hewlett Foundation

 

 

The League of Women Voters is implementing a project to engage people in public dialogue about quality of life. The project is the convening of community forums across that state that invite everyone to deliberate the issues behind creating a high quality of life in their community. The forums use a guide that the League has prepared through an issue framing process; the guide is called Choices for a Vital Community:Which Way Do We Go?

 

These forums provide a venue for citizens’ voices to be heard and for diverse members of the community to become involved. They will help initiate discussion from a local perspective and engage people in discussions with other community members. Participants in the forums begin to consider other perspectives and develop new perspectives. They begin to see their own role in solving public policy problems.

 

The community forums represent the first step in engaging the public in thinking about governance, land use and fiscal reform necessary to improve their quality of life. If not already engaged in political issues, they don't immediately think of reform as the solution to the problems they see in their community. Participants will have a better understanding of the complexity of the problems communities face and more realistic expectations of what can be done. They will recognize that they have a role in the process and see what possibilities for change they can support. These forums set the stage for the involvement being sought from the grassroots for reform measures that C2K participants are advocating.

 

What makes these forums different from other public forums?

 

The purpose of these community issues forums is to engage people in a dialogue with their fellow community members on a particular issue, in this case, creation of a vital(sustainable) community.  The desired outcome for the forum isthat engagement.  The framework fordiscussion must be constructed to allow that engagement to occur. The forumadheres to a particular model to accomplish this engagement, a model designedand successfully implemented nationwide by the Kettering Foundation called“National Issues Forums.”

 

There are two key elements to the model:

1) The framework for discussion captures different perspectives on the “problem behind the problem”.  For example, everyone may agree that bad traffic, unaffordable housing, and poor public education etc. are problems in California, but everyone does not agree on the underlying problem that has caused these ills.

2) There is no underlying agenda or lesson in the framework.  Participants engage in discussion because they feel their perspective about the underlying problem will be heard, not because someone else is going to tell them “the right answer” about what the underlying problem is. 

When this model is used, participants in the forum begin to consider other perspectives, see similarities among the perspectives, or develop new perspectives. In addition, by engaging in discussion they begin to see their own role in solving public policy problems. For example, in our Woodland test forum, participants felt they had created their own “blueprint” for a vital community in the forum.

 

How do these forums relate to reform issues?

 

The forums represent the first but essential step in engaging the public in thinking about governance, land use and fiscal reform as necessary to improve their quality of life.  People who are not engaged in political issues or policymaking generally don't immediately think of reform as the solution to their problems.

 

Participants in these community issues forums on vital communities will leave with a better understanding of the complexity of the problems communities face and more realistic expectations of what can be done.  They will recognize their own role in the process, move toward common ground on the issue, and have a sense of the possibility for change.  In this way, the forums set the stage for the League and other C2K participants to educate people about reform issues.

 

The Choice Book:

 

Should not be considered a stand alone document - it is a part of the issue forums.

Is not a stakeholder's document, or a regional vision blueprint - it is a guide for discussion.

Does not present a vision -it encourages participants to discuss their own vision.

Does not present solutions to problems - it captures different approaches to problems.

Does not have an underlying agenda or message.

 

Convening community forums

 

Your organization can convene  community forums on the topics presented in the book.  The convener of the forum is the group or individual that arranges the location, schedules and advertizes the forum, and arranges for the services of a moderator.  But the convener is also the host and sponsor of the event - a representative of the organization introduces the forum, the forum's purpose, and how and why the forum fits in with the community’s needs. These forums should be moderated by someone trained to moderate this type of forum and the Choice Book content.  The League will help you find such a moderator.

 

Contact:

Linda Phillips

Sustainability Project Coordinator

League of Women Voters of California

5107 Calle Asilo, SantaBarbara, CA 93111

PHONE: 805- 967-0922 (during business hours only, please)

FAX: 805- 967-6480

EMAIL:lindaphillips@alum.calberkeley.org