This page is archived from a past election.
See http://www.lwvc.org/ for current information.
LWV logo League of Women Voters of California LWVC logo
HOME   |   SEARCH   |  CONTACT US   |   SITE MAP              
Home > Elections > March 2002 > Pros/Cons > Prop 40
  PROPOSITION 40
March 2002 Election informationMarch 5 2002 Election menuSmart Voter, easiest way to view all available info on propositionsIn Depth Analysis of MeasuresOverview of State Bond DebtThe Initiative ProcessVoting in Primary: rules for votingHow to Evaluate Propositions (in English and Spanish)Pros and Cons of Ballot MeasuresEasy Reading Voter Guide

THE CALIFORNIA CLEAN WATER, CLEAR AIR, SAFE NEIGHBORHOOD PARKS, AND COASTAL PROTECTION BOND ACT OF 2002

Legislative Bond Act

THE QUESTION

Should the state borrow two billion six hundred million dollars ($2,600,000,000) through the sale of general obligation bonds for development, restoration, and acquisition of state and local parks, recreation areas and historical resources, and for land, air, and water conservation programs?

THE SITUATION

The state acquires, develops and improves recreational areas (such as parks and beaches), cultural areas (such as historic buildings and museums), and natural areas (such as wilderness, trails, wildlife habitat, and the coast). The state also provides grants to local governments for those purposes.

The last park bond act approved by the voters was Proposition 12, for $2.1 billion in bonds in March 2000. Funds authorized by the previous bond acts are mostly spent or committed to specific projects.

THE PROPOSAL

Proposition 40 will authorize the sale of $2.6 billion in general obligation bonds to conserve natural resources (land, air, and water), to acquire and improve state and local parks, and to preserve historical and cultural resources.

FISCAL EFFECT:

Costs are estimated at $4.3 billion over 25 years, or $172 million per year.

SUPPORTERS SAY

  • Our drinking water, our air and our beaches will be protected from toxic pollution.
  • Coastal lands and beaches threatened by development need protection.
  • Passage of Proposition 40 will help provide kids with safe places to play.
  • Our economy and environment will be enhanced and protected.

OPPONENTS SAY

  • In March 2000, voters funded $4 billion in bonds for similar projects. Why do we need another $2 billion that we cannot afford?
  • Bonds are an expensive and wasteful financing scheme, almost doubling the cost.
  • Some money will go to special interests. We shouldn’t all have to pay for that.
  • Local governments should finance their own projects.

For more information:

Supporters: Californians for Clean Water, Clean Air, Coastal Protection, and Safe Neighborhood Parks, (916) 313-4539, www.voteyeson40.org

Opponents: Senator Ray Haynes, (909) 698-2158, www.hjta.org


See also Smart Voter Proposition 40 and "In Depth".

 


You may link to any individual proposition page. You may print and circulate this copyrighted material if you use it in its entirety (the introductory page plus the six proposition pages) and give credit to the League of Women Voters of California Education Fund.

Send comments and suggestions concerning the content of this page to lwvcprocon@hotmail.com.
Send comments concerning the format or usability of this page to lwvc@vcwatts.org

Feedback Home Search the Site Contact Us Outline of Site

The League is a nonpartisan nonprofit organization of women and men
which never supports or opposes candidates or political parties.

© Copyright. League of Women Voters of California Education Fund. All rights reserved.
926 J Street, Suite 515; Sacramento, CA 95814.     916-442-7215     lwvc@lwvc.org