![]() |
|
November 2002 | ![]() |
|
|
|
||||
| HOME | SEARCH | CONTACT US | SITE MAP | ||||
EDUCATION FACILITIES:
KINDERGARTEN-UNIVERSITY PUBLIC EDUCATION FACILITIES BOND ACT OF 2002 THE QUESTION Should the state sell thirteen billion fifty million dollars ($13,050,000,000) in general obligation bonds for construction and renovation of K-12 school facilities and higher education facilities? THE SITUATION The last voter approved bond measure for school facilities was approved in November 1998 for $9.2 billion. The Office of School Public Construction reported in July 2002 that the current backlog of projects requesting state funds totaled $6.5 billion. The Office of Public School Construction data shows the need for 46,000 new classrooms or 1,175 new schools, in the next five years to relieve overcrowding and accommodate new enrollment. THE PROPOSAL This measure allows the state to issue $13.05 billion of general obligation bonds for construction and renovation of K-12 school facilities ($11.4 billion) and higher education facilities ($1.65 billion). At the K-12 education level, proposition 47 would provide: • $6.35 billion for new construction with local districts paying 50%
of costs. ($100 million would be reserved for new construction of charter
school facilities) At the public higher education level, $1.65 billion would be allocated to construct new buildings and related infrastructure, alter existing buildings, and purchase equipment for use in these buildings. The Governor and the Legislature would select the specific projects to be funded by the bond monies. FISCAL EFFECT Costs are estimated to be $26.2 billion over 30 years with average payment for principal and interest being $873 million a year. A YES VOTE would mean that the $13.05 billion in general obligation bonds would be made available for construction and renovation of K-12 school facilities and higher education facilities. A NO VOTE would mean that the $13.05 billion in general obligation bonds would not be made available for construction and renovation of K-12 school facilities and higher education facilities. SUPPORTERS SAY • Proposition 47 ensures the critically overcrowded districts get their fair share of the funds. • Gives our students access to the right technology today to be prepared for the workforce and society of tomorrow. • Provisions are in place for audits of how the money is spent, and funds can only be spent on building or renovating schools–no bureaucracy overhead. OPPONENTS SAY • California has tens of billions of dollars in outstanding bonds, and our credit rating is the third lowest in the country. We need to be extremely careful whenever we consider more debt. • Legislation allows schools to set aside funds in 2004 and not start building until 2011. • Proposition 47 favors Los Angeles Unified over every other district. They could receive 24% of the funds even though they account for only 12% of the students. For more information: Supporters: Yes on 47 for Accountability and Better Schools, (650) 340-0470,
www.yesprop47.com
You may link to any individual proposition page. You may print and circulate this copyrighted material if you use it in its entirety (the introductory page plus the seven proposition pages) and give credit to the League of Women Voters of California Education Fund.
Send comments and suggestions concerning the content of this page
to lwvcprocon@hotmail.com. |
| |
|
|
|