Smart Voter Your Ballot & Poll Place On Propositions Ballot Measure Analysis Pros & Cons Prop 1A Prop 65 Prop 59 Prop 66 Prop 60 Prop 67 Prop 60A Prop 68 Prop 61 Prop 69 Prop 62 Prop 70 Prop 63 Prop 71 Prop 64 Prop 72 PDF In Depth Prop 1A Prop 65 Prop 59 Prop 66 Prop 60 Prop 67 Prop 60A Prop 68 Prop 61 Prop 69 Prop 62 Prop 70 Prop 63 Prop 71 Prop 64 Prop 72 About Ballot Measures Background How to Evaluate State Bond Debt The Initiative Process Other Absentee Voting Register to Vote

SURPLUS PROPERTY.
Legislative Constitutional Amendment

THE QUESTION

Should the proceeds from the sale of surplus state property be dedicated to pay the principal and interest on the Economic Recovery Bonds approved in March 2004?

BACKGROUND

Surplus State Property. Current state statutes generally require a state agency to review annually its real property holdings (land and facilities) and determine what, if any, is in excess of its foreseeable needs. These properties are commonly referred to as "surplus state properties." They include both unused properties and those which are underutilized by an agency. Certain state-owned properties are excluded from being designated as surplus property, including any land designated for use for highway purposes.

Once real property has been identified as surplus, the state attempts to sell the property, or dispose of it in some other manner, such as by giving it to a local government. When surplus property is sold, the sales revenues are deposited into the account that originally paid for the acquisition of the property. In most instances, sales revenues are deposited in the state's General Fund and are available for expenditure on any state program.

Proposition 57 Bonds. In March of this year, voters approved Proposition 57, which authorizes the issuance of up to $15 billion in bonds to finance past budget deficits. The debt service (principal and interest payments) on these bonds is to be repaid over a 9- to 14-year period from designated General Fund revenues. (For more information on state bonds, please refer to the section of the ballot pamphlet or of In Depth entitled "An Overview of State Bond Debt.")

PROPOSAL

This measure requires that proceeds from the sale of surplus state property that occur on or after the passage of this measure be used to pay the principal and interest on Proposition 57 bonds. Once these bonds are fully repaid, proceeds from surplus property sales would be deposited in the General Fund.

The measure does not apply to properties acquired with specified transportation funds or other special fund monies. In other words, the measure only applies to those properties that were purchased with General Fund revenue or bonds secured by the General Fund.

FISCAL EFFECTS

Proceeds from the sale of surplus state property, which fluctuate significantly from year to year, are not a major source of General Fund revenue. For example, surplus property sales have averaged roughly $30 million a year over the past decade. (By comparison, total General Fund revenues in 2003-04 were roughly $75 billion.) By dedicating these surplus property proceeds to the debt service on Proposition 57 bonds, this measure would accelerate the bonds' repayment probably by a few months. In effect, the state would pay out more for debt service on these bonds in the short term and less in the longer term. (This is similar to what happens when individuals make additional payments on top of their regular car or home loan payments.) While this measure would not change the amount of bond principal, it would reduce the amount of interest payments over the life of the repayment period. We estimate that these interest savings--expressed in today's dollars--could be in the low tens of millions of dollars.

WHAT A YES OR NO VOTE MEANS

A YES vote means that the profits from the sale of state surplus property purchased with General Fund revenue would be dedicated to paying off the $15 billion deficit reduction bond debt approved by voters in March 2004.

A NO vote means that the profits from the sale of state surplus property purchased with General Fund revenue would continue to go into the General Fund.

SUPPORTERS SAY

• Proposition 60A would reduce the overall cost of the Proposition 57 deficit reduction bonds approved in March 2004 by accelerating repayment.

OPPONENTS SAY

• Proposition 60A does not force the sale of surplus state property. It only says that, if property is sold, the proceeds go to pay off the deficit reduction bonds.

SUPPORT AND OPPOSITION

Official ballot arguments in support are signed by Dan Stanford, Former Chairman, California Fair Political Practices Commission; Barbara O'Connor, Director, Institute for the Study of Politics & Media, CA State University, Sacramento; George N. Zenovich, Associate Justice, Retired, 5th District Court of Appeal; Michael S. Carona, Sheriff, Orange County; and Henry L. "Hank" Lacayo, State President, Congress of California Seniors.

Official ballot arguments in opposition are signed by State Senator Bill Morrow and State Assemblymember Sarah Reyes.

FOR MORE INFORMATION

Supporters

No contact information available.

Opponents

No contact information available.

Send comments concerning the format or usability of this page to lwvc@vcwatts.org