![]() |
|
November 2004 | ![]() |
|
|
|
||||
| HOME | SEARCH | CONTACT US | SITE MAP | ||||
ELECTION
RIGHTS OF POLITICAL PARTIES. THE QUESTION Should the California Constitution be amended to include the right of a political party participating in a primary election to also participate in the general election for that office? THE SITUATION California generally holds two statewide elections to elect a candidate to public office, a primary election (in March) and a general election (in November). Some public offices, such as Governor and members of the Legislature, are partisan, which means that a candidate represents a political party in an election. For partisan offices, the primary election determines each political party’s nominee for the office. The candidate receiving the most votes among a party’s candidates is that party’s nominee for the general election. In the general election, voters then choose among the nominees for each party as well as any independent candidates. THE PROPOSAL Proposition 60 places into the State Constitution a requirement that all parties participating in a primary election be able to advance their top vote-getting candidate to the general election. This requirement is met by the current election process as described above. Proposition 62 on this ballot also contains provisions affecting which primary candidates advance to the general election ballot. The State Constitution provides that if the provisions of two approved propositions are in conflict, only the provisions of the measure with the higher number of yes votes will take effect. FISCAL EFFECT This measure would not require any changes to election procedures. As a result, the measure would have no fiscal effect on state and local governments. WHAT A YES OR NO VOTE MEANS A YES vote means any political party that participates in a primary election would have the constitutional right to have its nominee on the subsequent general election ballot. A NO vote means that the California Constitution would not address the right of political parties to appear on a general election ballot. SUPPORTERS SAY
OPPONENTS SAY
For more information: Supporters: Committee to Preserve Voter Choice, Yes on 60, www.yeson60.com. Opponents: No contact information available
You may link to any individual proposition page. You may print and circulate this copyrighted material if you use it in its entirety (the introductory page plus the 16 proposition pages) and give credit to the League of Women Voters of California Education Fund. Send comments concerning the format or usability of this page to lwvc@vcwatts.org |
| |
|
|
|
|