|
HEALTH
CARE COVERAGE REQUIREMENTS.
Referendum
THE QUESTION
Should SB 2, the Health Insurance Act of 2003, become law?
THE SITUATION
In October 2003, the Governor signed SB 2. Proposition 72 will allow
the provisions of SB 2 to go into effect.
THE PROPOSAL
These are the major provisions of SB 2:
- SB 2 will extend health care insurance coverage to many uninsured
workers and families, including part-time and seasonal workers, under
new employer requirements.
- Employers’ requirements will depend on the number of their employees:
with 200+ employees, coverage for employees and their dependents will
start 1/01/06; with 50 to 199 employees, coverage for employees only
will begin 1/01/07; with 20 to 49 employees, coverage for employees
only if a tax credit is enacted.
- Coverage will be provided either by employers directly or by a
state program funded by fees paid by employers (“pay or play”).
- Employers’ share of insurance premium costs must be at least 80%
and workers’ share no more than 20%. Lowest-wage workers’ share can
be no more than 5% of their income.
- Fees will be collected by the Employment Development Department,
deposited into a new State Health Purchasing Fund, administered by
the state Managed Risk Medical Insurance Board. The Board will establish
a purchasing pool and negotiate contracts with health care insurers.
FISCAL EFFECT
Fiscal effects on individuals, businesses, and public agencies could
be significant. They are complex, uncertain, and difficult to predict.
Many costs will be offset by fees and tax revenues, but the amounts depend
on responses of employers, employees, insurers, and the health care and
insurance marketplace.
WHAT A YES OR NO VOTE MEANS
A YES vote means that SB 2 will go into effect.
A NO vote means that SB 2 is repealed.
SUPPORTERS SAY
- Too many people, including working people, are uninsured, and their
numbers are growing as employers struggle to control costs. SB 2 will
insure more than a million Californians.
- Uninsured workers and families are a costly burden on public agencies
and a threat to public health.
- Rising costs are forcing businesses to reduce or eliminate health
coverage for employees. SB 2 will give the state clout to bargain
for cheaper insurance and health care costs.
- Opponents exaggerate SB 2’s costs and other impacts on business
and the state economy.
OPPONENTS SAY
- The cost of this bill is too high, at least $5.7 billion for employers
and $1.5 billion for employees.
- SB 2 will severely impact businesses and their ability to compete.
Workers compensation and pensions are already a heavy burden on them.
- With the state’s finances in deep trouble, this is no time to take
on a costly new program.
- Workers who are shifted to a governmentrun program could end up
with lower coverage and fewer choices.
For more information:
Supporters: Yes on Prop 72, (916) 442-2308, www.yesonprop72.com
Opponents: Californians Against Government Run Healthcare, (916) 443-
3354, www.stopthehealthtax.org
You may link to any individual proposition page. You may
print and circulate this copyrighted material if you use it in its entirety
(the
introductory page plus the 16 proposition
pages) and give credit to the League of Women Voters of California Education
Fund.
Send comments concerning the format or usability of this page
to lwvc@vcwatts.org
|