|
--Begin vertical--
POSITION IN BRIEF: Support
citizens' right of direct legislation through the initiative and
referendum process.
--End vertical--
POSITIONS
1. California should retain the referendum and direct initiative.
2. California should adopt an indirect initiative procedure, preferably
as an optional alternative to the direct initiative.
--Begin vertical--
3. Drafting:
a. initiative sponsors should be required to submit draft proposals
to an official authority for an opinion on clarity/language, constitutionality/legality,
or single subject;
b. initiative proposals should be limited to a single subject and
written in language which is precise, clear, and understandable;
c. initiatives dealing with timely subjects should include a "sunset
clause," providing for an automatic expiration of the measure.
--End vertical--
4. Qualification:
a. requirements should be retained for:
1) direct initiative statute--valid signatures numbering 5 percent
of the total vote for all candidates for governor in the last
gubernatorial election, 150 days to collect signatures;
2) direct initiative constitutional amendment--valid signatures
numbering 8 percent of the total vote for all candidates for governor
in the last gubernatorial election, 150 days to collect signatures;
3) referendum on a legislative statute-- valid signatures numbering
5 percent of the total vote for all candidates for governor in
the last gubernatorial election, 90 days to collect signatures;
--Begin vertical--
b. the filing fee should reflect costs of processing initiative
and referendum proposals;
--End vertical--
c. no requirement for geographic distribution should be imposed;
--Begin vertical--
d. solicitation of signatures and campaign funds in the same mailing
should be allowed.
--End vertical--
5. Campaign:
--Begin vertical--
a. realistic limits should be imposed on contributions by individuals
and groups to initiative and referendum campaigns;
b. realistic limits should be imposed on expenditures by individuals
and groups to initiative and referendum campaigns;
c. there should be provision for free time for radio and TV information
programs for initiative campaigns;
--End vertical--
d. no public financing should be provided for initiative and referendum
campaigns;
e. the legislature should conduct public hearings on initiative
and referendum proposals around the state, with adequate public
notice;
--Begin vertical--
f. ballot pamphlet analyses of initiative and referendum measures
should be written for the reading level of the average citizen;
g. The ballot label and ballot pamphlet should clearly indicate
the effect of a yes vote and a no vote.
--End vertical--
6. Disclosure:
--Begin vertical--
a. sponsors of an initiative or referendum and organizations which
form a committee to support or oppose a measure should be required
to be listed by name in the ballot pamphlet, in mailings, and in
advertisements;
b. principal contributors to an initiative or referendum campaign
should be required to be listed by name in the ballot pamphlet,
in mailings, and in advertisements;
c. initiative and referendum committees should be required to use
names that reflect their true economic or special interest.
--End vertical--
7. Election:
a. voting on initiatives should take place at primary and general
elections but not at special elections;
b. an initiative statute or constitutional amendment, or a legislative
statute appearing on the ballot as a referendum, should be approved
by a simple majority of those voting on the measure to take effect;
c. an initiative statute or constitutional amendment which requires
a super-majority vote for passage of future related issues should
be required to receive the same super-majority vote approval for
its passage;
d. state initiative measures should apply to the entire state,
not only to those political sub-divisions in which they are approved;
--Begin vertical--
e. an initiative should not be allowed to provide for different
outcomes depending upon the percentage of votes cast in its favor.
--End vertical--
8. Post-Election:
a. approval by the voters should be required for any changes made
by the legislature in a statute adopted by initiative, unless the
statute permits amendment without the approval of voters;
--Begin vertical--
b. initiative proposals which do not win voter approval should be
allowed to appear on subsequent ballots without restriction, if
they again meet qualification requirements.
--End vertical--
9. Legal Aspects:
a. the definition of "single subject" pertaining to initiatives
should be redefined to ensure stricter interpretation and stricter
enforcement;
b. constitutional challenges to voter-approved initiatives being
reviewed in the state courts should be heard by a three-judge panel
rather than a single judge.
As Adopted at LWVC Convention '99; Readopted at last convention.
|